The Power of Persuasion

The power of artistry and media for persuasion can be used for occasional malicious intent.

I know, I know…you just read that and said, “Well, duh!” Seriously, though, I stopped to think about the direction our culture might have taken had certain extremely persuasive expressions not have occurred.

This afternoon, I read an intriguing article in PRINT Magazine about the post-World War II marketing blitz for hygiene products, and how the result was a silent panic among Americans that their body odor and bad breath was a horrendous burden to those around them, and so off they rushed to purchase whatever miracle-cure hygiene product was depicted in the given ad. I wonder if our definition of hygiene might be a bit different today if that hadn’t happened?

I wonder how much better our nation’s health statistics might look if the definition of “beautiful” hadn’t been programmed into us as that of a overly-tanned, eating-disordered supermodel (who wasn’t so perfect herself prior to digital image manipulation), or a muscle-studded he-man (notice I’m omitting a crack about an Austrian accent…oops, guess I didn’t, did I?).

I wonder how many public figures have risen or fell solely because they upset or made good with the right celebrities, artists, and commentators?

I remember an old 80’s song (I’m dating myself) by Snap called The Power. A line in the song (I won’t quote here for copyright reasons) makes reference to getting off the artist’s back, or regretting the attack that his lyrics would prove to be; in short, an ominous threat that an adequately persuasive and public expression against someone could spell social or political disaster.

The power to persuade is never to be taken lightly. Those of us with that ability bear the weight of making certain that we are persuading to the correct viewpoint, which requires some objectivity instead of an overly permissive post-modernism. All of us should also remember the value of critical thinking when confronted (as we are daily) by a marketing blitz for some item or other. The last thing our overly-materialistic nation needs is to allow ourselves to be programmed by more faulty imagery and fluffy feel-good words.

Who knows how history could turn on an eloquent speech?

We should know how it already has.


Digg!

Under the Rug

It seems like I’ve been lapsing into a great deal of political commentary, lately. Not really what I want this blog to be, but…well, it is a part of “culture,” and when things are so glaringly obvious, its hard to not comment on them…

I have had several friends who are law enforcement officers. The “blue wall of silence” can be a very real phenomenon. Troubling, but true. There is this idea that those outside of the profession can never truly understand what it takes to keep them safe and to just survive as a police officer, so “taking care of your own” is always justified, regardless of the ethical implications involved. It doesn’t exist in every location, but it definitely exists.

A counterpart certainly exists within the Bush administration. I’m still reeling from the news that Bush commuted Libby’s sentence. Obviously, those outside of politics just can’t understand what it takes to run a country and keep everyone safe, so…taking care of their own is always justified, regardless of the ethical implications involved.

And, of course, Bush was so noble in only commuting the sentence, instead of giving an outright pardon to one of his good ole boys. Such restraint!

So, if you piss off someone high enough on the food chain, and your family member happens to be in a potentially vulnerable position professionally, their career could become conveniently ruined, and that’s acceptable. You know, karma and all that.

Oops..did I make an implication there?

Well, if you think I have, check out Mr. Wilson’s implication in this article:

“The president, by commuting Mr. Libby’s sentence, has guaranteed that he will be under no incentive whatsoever to tell the truth…I think there is a very real suspicion now that the president himself is an accessory to obstruction of justice in this matter.”

Obstruction of justice? Outstanding!!! Please tell me we can impeach him now!

Please?


Digg!