When Words Fall Flat

I’ve had a whirlwind of a weekend to contemplate mortality.

My grandmother passed away last week, and Karen and I were subsequently away to be with my parents for the funeral and related events. I was surprisingly numb during the proceedings…I didn’t cry during the funeral service itself, or internment, which was reduced to mere minutes by freezing weather and snowfall. To be honest, I was disturbed at my ability to remain clinically detached from the entire event. My only near-tearful moments were during the initial Skype call last week when I received the news, and the day after the actual funeral while I joined the family in sorting through my grandmother’s personal effects. The absence of her in her own home, the same home she had lived in throughout my life, was striking.

I did receive a hard education, however, in our culture’s detachment from death. Of all the hands I was forced to shake and the countless transparently forced pleasantries I was forced to endure for my parents’ sake, I was astounded that Karen and I were offered genuine condolences only about 3 or 4 times, out of what must have been a hundred greetings, conversations, and handshakes. I also failed to understand the point of morbidly drawn-out ceremonies that stretched from Saturday night through Sunday afternoon: a viewing that was four hours of nihilism with bad music looping in the background, the afore-mentioned funeral with internment, and reception at my parents’ community of faith that, while extremely well-intentioned, was ultimately vacuous.

I fail to understand the honoring of a shell, the morbidity of forcing family members to re-state and acknowledge their loss over and over. There is nothing cathartic or therapeutic about this. Grieving occurs while the family is with each other, supporting each other. There is no point of public ceremony here. What had happened with her soul had already happened. Nothing that occurred prior to the actual service and internment offered any sense of closure. I found solace only in the fact that honoring words were spoken by the minister presiding, and that the brief internment (abbreviated by exposure to northern weather) actually did offer closure to our loss.

Now, I’m left to ponder the darkness of the entire event, the confronting with loss when it seems to me we should be celebrating an end to pain, a continuation of grandmother’s soul with Christ, the nature of which we can only speculate.

Perhaps most memorable about the weekend was a passing conversation with my father about moments in which the failing of language to express condolence is so palpable. He described one person simply shaking his hand in silence and conveying compassion with his eyes. That, I think, is so much truer than trite expressions or verbose wishes that do nothing but leave the grieving emptier after they are said.

And, of those who also offered similar silent condolences to me, I learned that my only response could be “thank you.”

I find it amazing that, as one who loves to craft words, I could find none more poetic than that in that moment, and yet, that those were far more cathartic and effective in their simplicity than the emptiness vocalized repetitively by so many.

I resolve after this weekend that, in the future, when I don’t know what to say to comfort someone, I will say nothing, because to attempt to encapsulate that moment with words reduces the moment to something flippant, and is the cruelest of affronts to the grieving.

Grace: Under Construction

What is it about our fallen natures that so thoroughly craves punishment and revenge?

A series of headlines about the New York crane accident that occurred last March have been re-surfacing lately, most recently (to my eyes) this one, discussing the criminal case against a contractor. Similarly, I was dismayed to hear of criminal charges being filed against the father of an Idaho girl who died after their car was disabled on Christmas Day. Why criminal? Why even sue for money? What will that solve? Will someone doing time in prison bring back the dead? Can we place a dollar amount on the life of a human being lost?

Apparently, we think so. In both of the cases I’ve listed above, there was negligence involved…it doesn’t require an attorney to see that. However, I fail to see the demand for causing pain in return as being of any comfort or closure at all.

We’ve all heard and read horror stories of American correctional systems. People who have done bad things go there to be locked away from society. There is no “correction” involved, only a removal of freedom as punishment. In these environments, bad people meet worse people and have years to learn how to be the worst people. Individuals are incarcerated for offenses that should never merit incarceration. Drug offences, for example; possession of a controlled substance can warrant long years in a “correctional facility” that does very little to educate or rehabilitate the offender. Then studies about high recidivism rates spark complaints and debates from activists and sociologists, nothing is accomplished, and the cycle continues.

I am not arguing that an individual who does something illegal should be free of consequences (although the large spectrum of what we consider “illegal” is a topic for another post). What is striking to me is the lack of grace that marks our penal system. Is it any wonder that legalistic, terror-filled views of God persist in a culture dominated by unforgiving punishment for everything from murder down to traffic offenses? This is a culture where we see police officers that are at best unable (due to circumstances) or at worst unwilling (due to callousness) to accept reasons for societal “misbehavior” when investigating an illegal act. This is a culture where “Don’t tase me, bro!” becomes a motto.

Permit me to propose a hypothetical scenario that is different from the way I perceive our justice system to operate: A teenager from an unstable home environment vandalizes a local mom-and-pop store. He is found guilty, or admits his wrong-doing. Instead of being incarcerated, he is taken under court supervision to apprentice under, for example, a glass repairman to learn how to (by working in the process) replace the window he has broken out of the store. He then works at a reasonable hourly rate to repay the store owners for what he has stolen. He is then released with knowledge of a vocation that makes him employable, a sense of responsibility, and connections that would assist him in finding employment, as well as having made restitution for his wrongdoing. This sounds much more like a concept of “corrections” to me.

I’m sure that the scenario I’ve described above has holes in the process…I’ve never claimed to be an attorney. I’m not arguing that there are offenses that, even Biblically, required the harshest of punishments…petit larceny is a long way from murder. From a spiritual standpoint, however, sin is sin. Old Testament Law appeared to focus on restitution for wrongs committed, not simply exiling the offender to a cell away from society in order, it seems, to attempt to separate the wheat from the chaff, as is the mark of today’s legal approach.

As wrought with difficulty as some of my logic may prove, I’m convinced that the concept holds, because it is a concept based on grace, not damnation. The legal system is merely the most obvious of realms from which I see grace notably absent. We should beware, I think, of desiring punishment and revenge for pain inflicted on us. Eventually, we will, in our human state, be the ones inflicting the pain, intentionally or otherwise.

In that moment, we will suddenly be yearning for the mercy we were once so unwilling to give. I suspect that our view of appropriate consequences would differ drastically at that point, don’t you?

In Search of Story

This is a random question I’m pondering today: do we have a thresh-hold for story?

I ask because I seem to be able to take in less at a time than others: Karen, for example, devoured two television episodes, a movie, and chapters from two different novels before going to bed last night. I managed the continuing plot of two consecutive television episodes, and was done. I attempted to share one of the novel chapters with her, but was mentally logged off.

Perhaps I move more slowly through unpacking a story than she does, or perhaps I’ve been ruined by being forced to read far too much non-fiction (and I don’t mean creative non-fiction) through my grad school days. Perhaps a good story is just like great food for me: I want to savor every bit of it. I don’t want to watch it or read it too fast…I want to catch the nuances, all the potential meta-message that may lie within the plot.

Karen does the same thing, just at a much faster pace.

Either way, I think it’s a good problem to have as there is simply too little appreciation for story in Western culture. Particularly, the overly religious among us tend to flee from it, apparently afraid of it’s power, afraid of being uncomfortable or being made to think by surrendering to a movie or play or novel for a few hours. I listened to Dr. Jerry Root recount today how he was raised thinking that if Christ returned while he was in a movie, he would be passed by.

This is fundamentally (pardon the pun) odd to me, as the most effective way to communicate an idea tends to be through story, whether personal narrative or fiction (such as the parables of Christ). Yet, so many great thinkers choose to communicate their concepts without the use of story. Perhaps that’s why theology becomes so potentially convoluted.

So my points here are that:

1) Every theologian should employ a ghost writer.
2) All of us should learn to return story to its proper high place in our personal and family cultures for the sake of perpetuating thought.

I doubt we’ll be fortunate enough for number 1 to happen, but I’m strongly optimistic for number 2.

In The Words of Another

I didn’t want to write an obligatory Christmas post. Rather, I wanted to leave something of an offering here, something to relate where I’ve ended up this season, pondering and attempting to get my head around this Incarnation that has forever altered history. Last night, as I was passing time, I stumbled upon a reading of Karl Barth’s 1958 Christmas sermon, “He Stands by Us.” This, I think, encapsulates where I’ve been taken this Christmas:

“My dear brothers and sisters, let me get to the main point without delay. Who is he who was born the son of Mary, wrapped in swaddling clothes, and laid in a manger? Who is he? I do not ask who he was. Christmas is not the birthday celebration of a man who lived long ago, then died and passed away, and whose centennial we solemnly commemorate. True, he once lived and then died–and how he died!–but he also rose from the dead; he is present and lives among us now, much closer to each one of us than we are to ourselves. Still, who is he? The answer to that question is the good news of Christmas.
Today, let me say simply this: He who was born in the stable is he who stands by you, stands by me, and stands by us all. I do not say one who stands by you, but he who stands by you. For only one, only he who was born on that first Christmas day, can stand by us in utter unselfishness and with ultimate authority and power…This is the good news of Christmas. He who stands by you and helps you is alive and present! It is he who was born that Christmas day! Open your eyes, open your ears, open your heart! You may truly see, hear, and experience that he is here, and stands by you as no one else can do!”

(You can find the entirety of the sermon re-printed here).

Blessings to all, and to all a good night.